The problem we saw
Most risk platforms grew into siloed systems that can produce reports, but struggle when teams need ad-hoc analysis, explainability, or answers fast enough to support real decisions.
About
If you can't explain why a risk number changed, can you really trust it? Risk teams shouldn't have to wait overnight to understand a number they need to defend today.
Most risk platforms grew into siloed systems that can produce reports, but struggle when teams need ad-hoc analysis, explainability, or answers fast enough to support real decisions.
We had seen first-hand how outdated architectures slow down treasury, ALM, and derivatives teams. Instead of layering more features onto that foundation, we started from scratch and built a new analytical engine.
Analytics improved dramatically in many industries, but banking risk systems often remained tied to overnight batches, fragmented tools, and limited drill-down. The complexity is real, but the bottleneck is usually the architecture.
Risk calculations are complex. They do not have to stay slow, opaque, and difficult to explain.
We built the platform around one idea: valuation, sensitivities, scenarios, and attribution should come from the same analytical foundation.
One engine for valuations, sensitivities, scenarios, and attribution instead of separate analytical layers.
Fast enough for interactive scenario analysis and desk-level exploration, not only overnight processing.
Every result can be traced, audited, and understood because the explanation stays connected to the calculation.
Designed for IRRBB, stress testing, audit, model governance, and the practical questions teams face in committees.
Risk analytics should be fast enough to guide decisions and transparent enough to defend them. Teams should not have to choose between performance and explainability.
MASTIX is led by two co-founders with deep backgrounds in derivatives, capital management, quantitative modeling, and financial software.
Based in Stockholm, Sweden, MASTIX builds for institutions that need risk workflows to be faster, more transparent, and more operationally useful.
If your current setup makes scenarios slow or explanations hard, we can show you a different way to work.